Reviews

"Specialists beware - despite its light and fluently entertaining style this book has an important message for our age. It is presented in so enjoyable a manner, however, that although its price reflects the publishers view that the book is a 'specialist text', I would strongly recommend this book to all."

Simon Sinclair, Cambridge Medicine Vol. 11 Number 2


"If the late John Fry's book General Practice: the facts was about how it is in general practice, this is the book about how it feels. Both are bookshelf companions which nobody concerned with healthcare in the UK today should be without. Both are accessible, enlightening and enjoyable...

For anyone who needs to recover from the dry and difficult instructions from the centre, for example, on the rules of the market, this book can make you laugh and cry, but brings you back to the real reasons why many people stay working in healthcare despite all the obstacles."

Annabelle Mark, The Health Service Journal 4/5/95


"(of putative guides to general practice) only a few - Epidemiology in Country Practice is a good example - give the impression that they evolved within general practice. Yet those are the books that I treasure and I have just acquired another one: The Paradox of Progress by James Willis...

At heart, this book is both a definition and a defence of the values of the 'generalist', but it is much more than that. Willis illuminates his argument with incidents from his own experience - many of which will generate echoes in the memories of other GPs - and, as the book progresses, you realise that these incidents are not mere illustrations but part of the argument itself - The book is a delight to read because Willis writes with a clarity of style that can only be achieved through clarity of thought - a commodity that grows increasingly rare in medical writing.

Near the end, he explains that he set out to explore ways of retaining respect for human value in an increasingly systematised world. By reading the book you become a partner in that exploration. I found it a rewarding experience, as, I suspect, will any GP who yearns for a more sustaining philosophy than the managerial and scientific pseuderies now inflicted on us."

Michael O'Donnell, Monitor Weekly 11/5/95


"This is a superb piece of writing; 132 pages of clearly and deftly expressed ideas around the theme of 'retaining respect for human values in an increasingly systematised world'. James Willis' love for his work and for his patients shines through in the book. I am grateful to him for expressing and explaining some of my own ill-understood feelings about my work and for the encouragement from his validation of the role of generalist, of common sense, and of being quite good at a lot of things, if not an 'expert' at any."

Tom Heyes, Review Quid Novi? (The Sheffield Faculty's newsletter) May 1995


"-his book is wonderful (yes, I know you're not supposed to say that sort of thing in a book review, and, no, I'm not on a commission). It's about the vital importance of humanity, common sense and generalists in our increasingly technological, regulated and specialist world. It is both witty and serious, and very easy to read, so would appeal to almost anyone. However, GPs are particularly likely to enjoy it because he writes from his experience as a GP, encapsulates much of the essence of being a GP, and includes some lovely anecdotes. 'I think he's dead, doctor' is probably my favourite, but you'll have to read it to find out why."

John Temple, Review Trent Bridge (Trent faculty newsletter)


"The best way I could describe this book is a mini Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance for doctors. Rather as Pirsig used motorcycle maintenance as the practical expression of his philosophy, so Willis uses his professional experiences in general medical practice as the medium through which he comments upon contemporary life. It is philosophy as autobiography. This is a difficult trick to pull off, but here it works well. The result is a substantial achievement which, because it has been done well, is easy to under- estimate.

I agree with his diagnosis that the distinctive malaise of modern life in Western democracies is the problem of judgement and its legitimacy. Judgement is everywhere being denigrated and replaced with committees, regulations and market mechanisms. There is a conflict between the explicit, the managed and the procedural on one hand,; and the implicit, the autonomous and the improvised on the other. In philosophical terms, Willis' concerns are continuous with those of Michael Oakshott in Rationalism in politics, with the difference that Willis approaches the problem from the side of practice.

Yet this sophisticated and humane critique is achieved with a lightness of touch and a degree of accessibility which is quite remarkable (and is, I would guess, the fruit of much toil). User-friendliness is increased by Willis' nice use of aphorism ('the tidiest place to store information is in your head') and his gift for the memorable metaphor (patients are kept in 'boxes' in the practitioners mind; and initiating a consultation is opening a box and zooming in on the contents). Several of these turns of phrase have already entered my vocabulary.

This care with which clarity has been sought, and the sheer readability of the text, indicate that Willis hopes for a readership among those who, like himself, are obliged to grapple on a day to day basis with problems demanding a response. Indeed it comes through clearly that the family physician must make vast numbers of decisions - quickly and on the basis of incomplete evidence. Even a decision to defer a decision must be an active one. The span of responsibility is vast, there is no fallback upon the certainties of narrow specialism or expertise; and yet there are good reasons to suppose that the job of a personal physician is better done by one generalist than by a team of specialists. It is in this sense that the family doctor can stand as a metaphor for Everyman, and the job of general physician as a model for life itself.

This is best illustrated through narrative, and the stories here are superbly told. Some are tragedies, quite exquisitely observed (I was actually moved to tears at one point). But Willis also has a real gift, of a Chestertonian kind, for highlighting the miracle of the mundane. I particularly liked his story of the blissfully free Saturday which began with an oppressive list of jobs and conflicts of priorities - and ended, totally unexpectedly, as dedicated to fixing an old door lock. This was, as it turned out, the best possible use of time - satisfying, useful, and impossible to predict. Without the space for lock-fixing, life would be lost in its living..."

Bruce Charlton, Review for Theoretical Medicine


"Look at his chapter headings and anyone who stops to think occasionally will feel the head starting to nod What it comes down to in the end is that you have to decide; who rules? Will it be the machines or the humans Go and read this book. And when you're finished you can start on Pirsig's two books. And after that you can read (if you can find it) Ivan Illich's 'Medical Nemesis' And when you've done that you will have the intellectual ammo to blow any six-pack of NHS administrators out of the water."

Declan Fox, Review GP Writer Autumn 1995


"Why does Dr Willis write at the moment? Because we are being assailed all around by 'progress'. Management consultants using new information technology have shown that we are only performing well if everything can be measured and quantified. Thus in hospital 'we can have nurses who deal personally on a daily basis with life and death situations, spending hours of each week tapping codes into computers A marvellous example of this, and witness to Willis' sense of irony and humour, is the 1965 Morris Minor manual which required daily checks of the tyres for stones and their removal. Was this ever really possible for anyone? His summary of this is that 'rules are not solutions at all - they have become the problems'..."

David Watt, Review Journal of the Balint Society September 1995


"The author argues against the trend to define, document and record in the name of progress. General practice is full of problems without absolutely correct answers or logical solutions. This book provides anecdotal examples. The GP's traditional role is now being threatened by the growth of central controls. Information technology is dehumanising society, and producing rules that are in themselves problems. Dr Willis argues that progress is detrimental to human values and motivation, and that the need for new ideas lies where common-sense practical studies prevail. This book should be read and discussed by every GP, and even more widely by those in other professions."

Keith Thompson, Review for Update 1/11/95


Return to the homepage